When a startup does decide that strategic investment is its best course of action, it’s critical to think about how it will structure that relationship to get the most out of the investor that’s interested.
When done well, strategic investments can create tremendous value for portfolio companies. Some of these include:
- Internal navigation of a corporate giant: Strategic investors know the right “go-to” folks internally to help evangelize and grow your customer-vendor relationship with the company.
- Product support and innovation: Instead of building them out yourself, you can take advantage of big product testing and R&D teams with expansive resources.
- Market insights: Your corporate investor has big market research and consumer insights divisions whose data you can take advantage of to better refine your product.
- Distribution/Operations/IP: Strategic investors may have access to supply chain expertise and real estate locations that will help scale your production and product rollout. They may also possess key branded IP to help your product’s market launch.
As an example, at the Disney Accelerator, Sphero produced a smartphone-controlled robot ball. Disney’s CEO, Bog Iger, had just come from his office having seen daily rushes from Star Wars: The Force Awakens when he visited the Disney Accelerator and realized that the movie’s BB-8 droid and Sphero had a natural partnership to come. Sphero was granted Disney Star Wars IP as a result of going through the company’s accelerator, and its BB-8 Sphero toy was the must-have Christmas toy of 2015. Disney gave Sphero the biggest possible boost in customer acquisition and retail shelf space.
How much responsibility should you bestow upon a strategic investor?
Do you want the strategic investor’s representative as a full-time board member? Board observer? Or perhaps just provide the strategic investor with basic information rights? Who will be your board member or touch-point at the corporate level? If it’s someone junior from the strategic investor’s ventures group, for example, then you should probably object and ask for the most senior person you can get. He/she is likely to have the power to get things done on your proposed partnership investment.
It’s worth noting that a way of getting access to strategic benefits accompanying an investment is through your advisory board or angel investors. A startup’s advisory board could grant equity to senior and experienced executives from their relevant industry, assuming the executive got sign off from conflicts of interest by their compliance department. Alternatively, appointing ex-senior directors and executives from said corporate team could be an idea to pursue as they’re likely to have strong remaining ties to their former employer — or at the very least, can help you understand how decisions get made and who the right point people are to benefit your business.
If strategic investors enter a startup’s cap table, as discussed above, they often do so as a call option for acquisition down the line. Certain legal terms like Right-of-first-refusal and Right-of-first-negotiation come up here. Long time lawyer, Justin Hovey, partner at the Pillsbury law firm, had the following to say:
“Founders and investors typically seek a path to liquidity, i.e. sale or IPO. Strategic investors typically seek a path to control. So there is a potential misalignment of objectives, and founders have to be careful about creating impediments to the liquidity event, such as providing the strategic investor a blocking right or a “last look” benefit. If the founder isn’t able to resist these rights altogether, then they should at the least look to define events that they won’t apply to — such as any sale with a 5x return.”
Acquisition is usually preceded by a business relationship whereby the corporate organization is a customer of the startup, but a customer with increasingly stronger ties over time. The startup’s value creation and value creation trajectory become clearer as both parties fall deeper into bed with one another, culminating in a wedding day acquisition. Daniel Kan, co-founder of Cruise Automation, a company that sold to GM for reportedly north of $1 billion this year, said: “It’s definitely a benefit to having strategic investors. Whenever you are easing you have to tell the story on why your company is going to be the next Apple or Google. Having people in your industry showing their support through their wallet will go a long way towards telling that story.”
Problems may arise when a strategic investor does not elect to buy a startup in which it has already invested. This can create bad signaling for other potential strategic acquirers as a competitor will wonder why the strategic investor didn’t want to buy — what’s wrong with the business? The prevailing thought becomes: “They obviously know more about the company than I do, so there must be something wrong with it if they’re not buying, therefore neither will I.”
Other times a strategic investor will intentionally acquire a startup to prevent its competitor from doing so. As a startup, you should be talking to several strategic competitors when looking for a buyer, perhaps even seeking a sector-focused banker to help navigate the transaction. It’s worth noting that you may be shutting the door to other strategic investors if you take money from one, with its competitors possibly less likely to work with you. Even more egregious is when the strategic investor chooses to compete directly with its portfolio company. For example, Google invested in Uber and recently stepped off Uber’s board to compete more directly in ride sharing and autonomous vehicles with the startup it once looked to help.
A seed or Series A investment is a small initial cash outlay for a strategic investor — a small initial experiment. An acquisition worth several hundred million dollars is a different matter entirely. The former may be mentioned in passing at a strategic investor’s board meeting, if it’s even deemed important enough to discuss at all. The latter will take time, discussion over several board meetings, and perhaps even an EGM (extraordinary general meeting) to get mass shareholder approval. Therefore, just because a strategic investor invested in a particular startup does not mean the investor’s only acquisition target choice will be said startup. The strategic investor will seek the best opportunity to take advantage of industry lessons learned through its initial investment.
James Joaquin, co-founder of Ophoto and Obvious Ventures, has a story about this. Ophoto raised money from HP, among other parties, at the Series B. Lyft Chief Strategy Officer and ex-Mayfield Fund partner Raj Kapoor had a competing photo startup named Snapfish in which Kodak had invested. In a strange turn of events, HP acquired Snapfish and Kodak acquired Ophoto. Neither strategic investor bought the startup in which it had invested, instead opting to buy the one in which its competitor had invested. In this instance, the strategic investor used its investment as a learning opportunity — getting smarter and then realizing that a better alternative existed for target acquisition than the petri dish in which it had already invested.
The lesson here: Corporate M&A doesn’t always follow conventional logic from corporate venture investing.
Be strategic about strategic investment
In many ways, strategic investors have the same appeal for entrepreneurs as celebrity investors: It gives them the opportunity to be associated with a household name, generate buzz and gain access to key players. But it’s not a standard investment, and startups would be wise to not treat it as one. Ask the right questions, talk to past portfolio companies, clearly define the strategic benefits to be gleaned prior to taking a strategic investment and be prepared to push back at the negotiating table if asked for any privileges that would be non-standard in a financial VC’s investment discussion.
This article was written by Valley Voices from Forbes and was legally licensed through the NewsCred publisher network.
The information contained in this article is provided to you as-is, does not necessarily represent the views of First Republic Bank, does not constitute legal advice, is governed by our Terms and Conditions of Use, and we are not acting as your attorney. We make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to this website and its associated sites.